This distortion happens when we have no room for middle ground. If we think that a small fault in ourselves means weโre fundamentally rotten or otherwise terrible, weโre likely engaging in All or Nothing Thinking.
I failed this interview, so I'll fail all my interviews.
All or Nothing Thinking is really similar to Overgeneralization. They both happen when we take one small problem and extrapolate it out.
If weโre taking a small problem and blowing it way out of proportion, weโre Catastrophizing. Did you make a small mistake at work and are dreading if someone found out even though itโs nothing serious? Youโre probably catastrophizing.
Often this cognitive distortion is a series of thoughts, one after the other.
I took too long to answer that interview question
Because I took too long, I'll bet I failed the interview.
Because I failed this one, I'll probably fail all interviews I get.
Because I'll fail all my interviews, I'm probably just bad at this career and I should give up.
Catastrophizing is similar to Minimization of the Positive and Magnification of the Negative.
Some mental health professionals call this "making a mountain out of a molehill."
"I feel it, therefore it must be true."
If we find ourselves justifying the "danger" of something innocuous because weโre afraid of it, then weโre likely engaging in Emotional Reasoning. Things arenโt dangerous because weโre afraid of them and weโre not awful just because we may think we are.
This one is often hard to recognize. It takes some effort to recognize when your emotional mind is taking the logical reins.
I feel guilty, therefore I must have done something bad.
I feel scared, therefore this must be dangerous.
Emotional Reasoning is common when were also Fortune Telling. Frequently, we'll use our own emotions to justify our predictions.
Fortune Telling happens when we try to predict the future. If we're worried something will happen, we're fortune telling.
We often overestimate our abilities to predict what will happen. This can happen when we start at something we're worried might happen and then look for evidence that it will occur.
If we're worried the plane we're on will crash, we may take any scratch on the wing or strange tone in the pilots announcement as proof of our concern.
The plane I'm about to get on will crash.
I'll fail this interview.
I'll get sick at this party.
Mind Reading is similar to Fortune Telling since it often requires you to believe information that you have no way of knowing.
If we're judging a situation based entirely on the negative parts and not considering the positive parts, we're likely magnifying the negative. If weโre constantly berating ourselves for bombing a job interview, we're probably filtering out all the experience we gained from that interview.
I ate healthy this week, but I skipped the run I had planned.
Often Magnification of the Negative can lead to Catastrophizing. It also shares a lot with its counterpart: Minimization of the Positive.
If we're taking one characteristic of a person and applying it to the whole person, we're Labeling. If someone brushed us off, they might not be a "jerk," maybe they're just in a hurry. This applies to ourselves as well; just because we make a mistake doesn't mean we're a "failure."
I failed a test, so I'm a bad student.
Labeling can often come from Should Statements, since often when we think someone should be a certain way, we're also labeling them.
If we're worried about what someone else is thinking about us, we're Mind Reading. Unless someone tells you what they're thinking, you have absolutely no way of knowing. So why assume the worst?
I think I was rude to George, I'll bet he hates me.
Mind Reading is similar to Fortune Telling since it often requires you to believe information that you have no way of knowing.
If we downplay the good things that are happening to us, we're minimizing the positive. Even if our day didn't go 100% as planned, it doesn't mean that the 60% that did go right should be ignored.
Many people liked my presentation, but I stumbled giving the intro, so it was bad.
Often Minimization of the Positive can lead to Catastrophizing. It also shares a lot with its counterpart: Magnification of the Negative.
If a bad situation must be the fault of someone else, we're other-blaming. If you failed an exam and you're blaming the teacher, you're directing your energy to the wrong place. Someone cut you off on the highway? If you honk your horn, flip them off, and stew, how is that helping? Now you're cut off and mad!
This doesn't mean you have to blame yourself for every negative situation. You don't have to blame anyone. No one has to be at fault if you let the situation pass without attaching blame.
That jerk is taking too long in line and I'm going to be late!
Other Blaming is the counterpart to Self Blaming.
If we draw conclusions based on just one example, we're over-generalizing. If you bombed a presentation and assume that means you're "bad" at presenting, you're over-generalizing.
No one asked me to dance, so no one ever will.
Overgeneralization is really similar to All or Nothing Thinking. They both happen when we take one small problem and extrapolate it out.
If you're attributing a negative situation entirely to yourself, you're self-blaming. You don't have to be responsible for every bad thing that happens. If you're getting caught in traffic and you're berating yourself for not leaving earlier, you're self-blaming. Would you treat someone else this way?
My son is failing in school, I must have failed him.
Other Blaming is the counterpart to Self Blaming.
If you're assigning someone abilities they don't have, you're using faulty "should" statements. For example, if you have a fear of flying and are telling yourself "I shouldn't be afraid of this, there's nothing wrong with the airplane!" you're putting an undue burden on yourself. You have a fear of flying! It's normal for people who have a fear of flying to be afraid flying!
Should statements can seem nonsensical when you say it out loud; that's the point! They're illogical!
I'm an adult, I shouldn't have these mental issues.
Labeling can often come from Should Statements, since often when we think someone should be a certain way, we're also labeling them.